799 results for 'cat:"Arbitration"'.
J. Brown, in this interlocutory appeal, finds the circuit court properly denied the nursing center's motion to compel arbitration in this wrongful death suit. The estate alleges that due to insufficient staffing the deceased party was not turned often enough to prevent the stage 2 wound to her left coccyx, a boil to her left buttock, and an unstageable wound to her right heel. The patient was also dehydrated and malnourished, which prevented healing. There is insufficient evidence that the deceased party authorized her daughter to bind her to arbitration. The daughter did not have actual authority to enter into the agreement on her mother's behalf. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Brown, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: CV-23-182, Categories: arbitration, Health Care, Wrongful Death
J. Detjen finds that the trial court should have granted an employee's motion to withdraw from arbitration after his former employer failed to timely pay the arbitration fees and costs. The employer was $250 shy of the full amount due, and its argument that the employee had to pay one-half that amount fails because the arbitration agreement's sharing provision only applies to the initial case management fee, which had already been paid. Also, the employee's silence when the employer sought an extension did not mean he "agreed" to the extension. Reversed.
Court: California Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Detjen, Filed On: May 6, 2024, Case #: F086342, Categories: arbitration, Employment, Sanctions
J. Piper finds the lower court properly compelled arbitration to determine the proper beneficiaries of the estate's investment accounts. Although the investment company filed its indemnification claim outside the statute of limitations, the arbitrator must make the ultimate determination as to whether it has jurisdiction over the claims. Additionally, the investment company did not waive its right to arbitration when it delayed its request because it did not file any counterclaims, engage in discovery or take any other actions that could be construed as a willingness to litigate the dispute in court. Affirmed.
Court: Ohio Court Of Appeals, Judge: Piper, Filed On: May 6, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-1729, Categories: arbitration, Civil Procedure, Wills / Probate
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
Per curiam, the appellate division finds that the trial court should have upheld an arbitration award because the arbitrator's findings were well-reasoned and remained consistent with the parties' collective bargaining agreement. Reversed.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: CA 23-00699 , Categories: arbitration
J. Lyle finds that the lower court properly denied the plaintiff driver's request for statutory costs and but improperly denied her prejudgment interest as the prevailing party in an arbitration proceeding stemming from a motor vehicle suit. The driver did not request costs in her litigation papers, which is a required step even before the arbitrator designated her as the prevailing party. However, as the assessment of interest does not qualify as "damages," the driver is still entitled to this money without having made a prior request to the arbitrator. Reversed in part.
Court: Illinois Appellate Court, Judge: Lyle, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 230079, Categories: arbitration, Vehicle, Damages
J. Gallagher finds the lower court properly denied the pizza restaurant's motion to vacate an arbitration award in favor of the Cleveland Browns. Although the restaurant couches its argument in jurisdictional terms, it is merely an attempt to raise claims about the validity of the arbitration award it failed to bring in a direct appeal. Affirmed.
Court: Ohio Court Of Appeals, Judge: Gallagher, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-1686, Categories: arbitration, Jurisdiction, Contract
J. Shea grants the employer's motion to compel arbitration, ruling the contract at issue in this case is between two business entities and, therefore, is not covered by any exemption to the Federal Arbitration Act, including the exemption involving workers engaged in interstate commerce, such as the delivery drivers who brought the suit. Additionally, the fee-shifting provision of the arbitration clause does not render it unconscionable because the drivers have not shown arbitration costs would be prohibitive, while the bold and large type on the contract negates any argument the agreement was deceptive.
Court: USDC Connecticut, Judge: Shea, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv1695, NOS: Other Labor Litigation - Labor, Categories: arbitration, Employment, Labor
J. Tunheim grants a motion to correct clerical errors in a prior order on an arbitration award, but denies motions to stay enforcement of a judgment, to expedite, and to alter or correct that judgment and adopts a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, while denying attorney's fees to all parties.
Court: USDC Minnesota, Judge: Tunheim, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 0:17cv5009, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: arbitration, Civil Procedure, Attorney Fees
J. Cobb grants the American oil company's motion for default judgment and to confirm an arbitration award in its action against the Iranian oil company alleging that natural gas it purchased was never delivered. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the dispute, since the parties agreed to arbitrate this dispute in a New York Convention signatory country and it is commercial in nature, and personal jurisdiction over the Iranian company since the American company successfully accomplished service when it received a "read" receipt of a service email. The American company has also satisfied procedural requirements for enforcement, and there is no reason to deny them confirmation.
Court: USDC District of Columbia, Judge: Cobb, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv1361, NOS: Arbitration - Other Suits, Categories: arbitration, International Law, Jurisdiction
J. Bennett grants Sherwin-Williams’ motion to compel arbitration and stay of the proceedings in this employment dispute brought by a former paint mixer who alleges race discrimination based on a failure to rehire claim. The paint mixer argues that the arbitration agreement was outside of the scope of his claims and not valid. The court found the arbitration agreement to be valid and enforceable, delegating the threshold issue of arbitrability to the arbitrator.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Bennett, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv3190, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: arbitration, Employment Discrimination, Employment Retaliation
J. Reiss grants the bank’s motion to stay the action and refer to arbitration in this employment agreement dispute brought by a former executive president who says his assets had been converted. The court found the arbitration clause to be broad as to all disputes related to the employment agreement, and the arbitrator needs to decide the issues of arbitrability.
Court: USDC Vermont, Judge: Reiss, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv274, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: arbitration, Employment, Contract
J. Immergut grants the insurance company's motion to compel arbitration in the insured's lawsuit alleging that the insurance company wrongfully disagreed with the value of the insured's claim for the injuries she sustained while pregnant during an accident with an at-fault, underinsured motorist. The insured implicitly agreed to arbitration when her demand letter stated that she “demands, consents, offers and commits to arbitration," so no new consideration is required. The insured also limited her ability her recovery attorney fees when she instituted arbitration proceedings.
Court: USDC Oregon, Judge: Immergut, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 3:24cv25, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: arbitration, Insurance, Attorney Fees
J. Horan finds that a company that repeatedly attempted to deliver a summons regarding an arbitration claim has not met requirements for a substituted service by email. The company attempted to serve the documents at several prior addresses but failed to identify a current address for the intended recipient. The motion to serve by email is denied at this time, but the company’s service deadline is extended.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Horan, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv2642, NOS: Arbitration - Other Suits, Categories: arbitration, Civil Procedure
J. Lake finds that class action claims by a dental office customer, who received text messages and calls from the dental office even though he requested to be added to the “do not call list,” cannot proceed because the claims fall under an arbitration agreement. The customer of the dental office signed an arbitration agreement when he first engaged the dental office for services. The dental office’s motion to strike the class allegations and its motion to compel arbitration are granted.
Court: USDC Southern District of Texas, Judge: Lake, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 4:23cv3460, NOS: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) - Other Suits, Categories: arbitration, Communications, Consumer Law
J. Prescott grants the majority owner's motion to dismiss the appeal filed by the minority owners, ruling his motion to confirm an arbitration award was not stayed upon the filing of this appeal.That motion was separate from the underlying civil complaint and did not seek to "enforce or carry out a judgment," as required under the rules of civil procedure.
Court: Connecticut Court Of Appeals, Judge: Prescott, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: AC56348, Categories: arbitration, Civil Procedure, Fiduciary Duty
J. Brailsford denies in part an insurance company's motion for summary judgment regarding an insurance coverage dispute following a plane crash. While the pilot walked away unharmed, the plane, which crashed shortly after takeoff, sustained extensive damage. The plane owner alleges that the insurer has not paid for certain repairs in violation of the insurance policy. A genuine dispute of material fact remains as to whether the insurer paid the amount required under the insurance policy. Because the insurance company has waived its right to compel arbitration, its motion for summary judgment on the contract claim is denied.
Court: USDC Idaho, Judge: Brailsford, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv176, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: arbitration, Insurance, Contract
J. Bradberry finds that the trial court improperly denied the contractor's motion for a preliminary injunction against the construction company in their dispute about the arbitration clause in their contract. There are several indicators that the contract and the construction company did not fully finalize the disputed subcontract, and the trial court wrongfully held that the contractor's estimator had the authority to bind the contractor to the subcontract. Reversed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Bradberry, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: CA-23-557, Categories: arbitration, Contract, Injunction
J. Gladwin finds the circuit court improperly denied the assignee of the vehicle purchase contract's motion to compel arbitration. The purchaser defaulted on payment and the assignee repossessed the vehicle. The purchaser sought class certification for deceptive trade practices claims arising from the assignee's requiring her to pay repossession report fees to law enforcement agencies. The arbitration agreement is valid and enforceable under the Automotive Dealer's Anti-Coercion Act, satisfying the mutuality-of-obligations element of a binding contract. The assignee did not waive its right to demand arbitration in the purported class action by filing a separate action for a deficiency judgment. Reversed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Gladwin , Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: CV-22-756, Categories: arbitration, Debt Collection, Contract
J. Segal finds that the trial court properly denied an employer's motion to arbitrate an employee's Private Attorneys General Act claims. The trial court had the authority to decide the arbitrability of his claims since the arbitration agreement the employee signed did not clearly delegate arbitrability decisions to an arbitrator. And the agreement itself excluded both the employee's individual and representative Act claims. Affirmed.
Court: California Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Segal, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: B328425, Categories: arbitration, Employment